Reviewing Metavista: Bible, Church, and Mission in an Age of Imagination

Metavista: Bible, Church and Mission in an Age of Imagination by Colin Greene & Martin Roinson

Who Will Like This Book (or might not) – Those that want to see church, culture and history from further out.  Whether you feel you are educated enough in it or not, if you have a high appreciation for history, you will really appreciate it.  If you are not into the emerging church authors (like McLaren, Jones, Pagitt, Keel, etc.), I think it would be beneficial to hear these words from those that do not identify with the movement.  If you are a friend of emergent, I think this book is very beneficial as well.  Having been in the emerging discussion, this is among the things that are humbly encouraged, read a lot of other stuff  (emergent plug – none of us feel we’ve cornered the market on pomo thought).

Who Won’t (or might not) – Those who have less appreciation for context and require Biblical proof texting; those who don’t understand where the history of philosophy fits in; those who think that the timeline of Christian literature went from the canonization of the New Testament, a few church fathers, Calvin, then John Piper while ignoring the millions of other voices throughout the past several thousand years  (I write that last one to a specific caricature, don’t mean to offend).

What I Found Difficult – I really enjoyed reading this book and I didn’t see skimming as an option.  Because of this, there’s a lot to read here.  Perhaps it was my attention span but I really wanted to remember what I read (what a new idea), so it was just one of these books where you really needed to take the necessary time and read.  Thus, you may not like it, if you’re not able to commit the time to it. 

 

What I Loved -  I was a fan from the introduction.  Seriously, it’s one of those books that if you love the introduction, you’ll probably like the book.  I didn’t feel let down as I continued reading the book though it was grappling with extremely difficult topics.

 

While reading through it, I appreciated all the quotes from those like Augustine, Kierkegaard, Brueggemann, Newbigin, Caputo, (even Bono is quoted), and many others.  I felt it connected me to the thoughts and ideas of so many others.  For those like myself who have a scattered interest in a lot of things, I appreciate books that contain histories and summations from the greats that have come before.

 

There are so many books to read, so many to recommend, I’d like to sell you on this one. 

Here’s a preview and table of contents:

What is metavista? – “… a relatively unclaimed space or clearing” (xxix).

 

Part1

1. Modernity: Legacies that Remain

2. Postmodernity: A Matrix of Meanings – This chapter begins, “In his book Postmodernism for Beginners” Richard Appignanesi suggests that the postmodern is something unavoidable.  His candid assessment is that the modern is always historically at war with what comes immediately before it” (25).

(Why I like it –  As been told to me countless times, I too keep trying to convince people that the idea of postmodernism is more than a philosophy but an age, specifically a response to modernism.)

3. Metavista: Discerning the Rules of Engagement – deals with many issues from voice, representation to power.

4. Metavista: Naming the Post-modern Condition – consumerism, post-colonialism, secularization, individualism (to name a few).

 

Part 2

5. Cultural Engagement and the Refiguring of the Scriptures – narratives and indwelling

6. Constructing a Biblical Theology for Cultural Engagement – demonstrates that postmoderns can be Christians ;-)

7. Metavista:  The Political Capital of the Bible in Cultural Engagement – umm, well, Greene likes Hauerwas.   Though this book is written from a European perspective, I think this chapter is helpful for American readers (especially Christian conservatives) interested in politics and culture.

 

Part 3

8. Deconstructing the Secular Imagination – the strength and weakness of secularization and its effect on religion

9. Imagining the Missional Community – Includes some big topics of the Modern West’s Christendom such as evangelical renewal, programmatic responses, emergent church, and offers humble conclusions.

10. Reimagining a Counter-cultural Life – one of my favorite chapters in the book.

11. Towards a Hermeneutic of Imagination – public theology, missional imagination and the pride of Biblical Seminary, John Franke is quoted here.

12. Conclusion and Beyond – calls for a new manifesto

Monday Morning Brief – 2.3.09

Yeah I know it’s Tuesday.   Consider it like Lost’s ripple in time.  So who knows what day it really is?

Highlights – Not real sure I had any “highlights” but it was a good week of life.  1. Our Super Bowl party was pretty fun.  Appreciated the family that hosted us.  Though I’m not a Cardinals fan, I really wanted them to win.  Appreciated what Tony Kornheiser from Pardon the Interruption said, “People are going to say the Cardinals lost it.  But they didn’t – they won it.  But then the Steelers came back and won it again …”.  Third best Super Bowl ever.  2. Spoke at a different youth group at another church this weekend.  I think most of us were blessed by the night 3. We went to a memorial of a friend that died two years ago, and there was a nice spirit there. .  4. North Jersey Cohort meeting – good people.  5. Deepening some friendships some through great conversations, others through stress.  6. I got to rest a little this week.

Reading -  Finally finished Metavista: Bible Church and Mission in an Age of Imagination (review coming soon).  Re-reading Dan Kimball’s They Like Jesus But Not the Church.  Just started, Inspiration and Incarnation by Pete Enns.  And trying to catch up on all the great blog posts I’ve missed in recent weeks. 

Listening to – Nothing new.  Podcasts from Relevant, Mars Hill and a terrific one with Ed Dobson the other week and I loved Fermi Project’s latest with Jon Tyson. Also really enjoyed Homebrewed Christianity’s podcast with Richard Rohr.   Cleaned the Fireside Room (the youth room) while listening to Dylan’s Blood on the Tracks and Bringing It All Back Home.

Youth Ministry Update -  The last two weeks were midterms for my Senior Highers, so youth group was a little more relaxed.  One week I showed the “Making of Miss HIV” which is a documentary about an AIDS beauty pageant (more info here).  I almost didn’t show it because it featured the Newsboys (and I know how that sounds but they did record a song called, “Breakfast in Hell” and they’ve used the same set list for the past 7 years.  I feel like I’m in one of those Foster’s Beer commercials where the word is different even though it’s the same language.  Let me try – “Repetitive”, It’s American for “boring”).  Where was I?  Oh, well the Newsboys’ participation on this project was great and I was moved by it.  I may even buy their new cd, Take Me to  Your Leader.

Last week we watched Invisible Children’s “Sunday”.  All of our students were pretty moved by it.  Some inquired what we could do.  I encouraged us to be faithful with the opportunities afforded us and while I didn’t want this to be a commercial for our mission trip this summer (we’re building new cabins for AIDS/HIV victims in Nassau after attending YS’s DC/LA), I think some caught to one I meant.

Looking forward to (but with a bit of anxiety) – 1.  Beginning our next Sr. High Series, They Like Jesus But Not the Church video curriculum.  2. “Pastor-Parent Night” this week.  Some call it dancing through the minefield but in past years.  My frustration has been some “questions” and “concerns” can be made privately and in a way that demonstrates Christian love as opposed to what seems to be an attempt to embarrass you in front of parents.  So far, it hasn’t been bad and in truth, I have enjoyed some fruitful discussion and it’s an opportunity to share about our mission trip.  So I guess we’ll see.

How I "Plan" on Doing Book Reviews

Sometimes the book reviews I see on blogs leave me a little frustrated if they don’t contain enough opinion. Like the ones that say “review” but only give the Amazon summary from Publisher’s Weekly.   Then there are the posts that are so long that you think you might as well just get the book or bookmark the post and treat it as a cliff notes version of it.  There’s a couple other things that annoy me and I’m sure I do things that annoy others but here’s what I know:

I am not a scholar so I will not critique pretending to be one.  We’ve been trained by our seminaries and under-graduate programs to be more critical thinking than we actually are. But here in the big world of the internet, let’s be careful to who we think we are.  So, I’m not a book critic.  I’m a guy, offering an opinion that may or may not help you.

I will try to make them brief (or at least not to thick if they are not brief).

I will create context and stereotypes to keep them brief (this will frustrate some).  Be warned, I know they may not always be accurate.

I will do my best to be honest.

I will probably change this post several times.